CRAN Package Check Results for Package teal.modules.clinical

Last updated on 2024-08-16 12:49:22 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.9.1 26.95 217.74 244.69 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.9.1 17.93 147.07 165.00 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.9.1 402.21 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.9.1 402.35 OK
r-devel-windows-x86_64 0.9.1 28.00 229.00 257.00 NOTE
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.9.1 38.01 203.34 241.35 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.9.1 25.13 202.94 228.07 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 0.9.1 81.00 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.9.1 160.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 0.9.1 30.00 228.00 258.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 0.9.1 95.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.9.1 154.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 0.9.1 38.00 291.00 329.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.9.1
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package anchors: split_choices.Rd: choices_selected template_coxreg_m.Rd: control_coxreg template_coxreg_u.Rd: control_coxreg tm_t_tte.Rd: data_extract_spec, coxph_pairwise, surv_timepoint, surv_time Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the package itself and the base packages. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64

Version: 0.9.1
Check: package dependencies
Result: NOTE Imports includes 24 non-default packages. Importing from so many packages makes the package vulnerable to any of them becoming unavailable. Move as many as possible to Suggests and use conditionally. Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang

Version: 0.9.1
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Undeclared packages ‘emmeans’, ‘labeling’ in Rd xrefs Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang